Sunday, February 28, 2010

In May of 2009 we visited Brocket Hall, formerly the home of Lord Melbourne, now part of a golf complex. The house, in excellent condition, serves as a venue for corporate events and weddings. Brocket is located near Hertford and Haftfield just north of London. Part of the original land of the adjacent country homes of the London wealthy has been developed into Welwyn Garden City.

The ballroom in Brocket was used for the interiors of Netherfield, the home rented by Mr. Bingley, in the 1995 BBC version of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. In the picture at right, you see Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth leading the country dance. In the far background, you can barely make out a portrait of George, Prince of Wales, standing beside the rump of his horse. The painting, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, was presented to Elizabeth, Lady Melbourne (mother of the Prime Minister), who reputedly was the mistress of the Prince for a time.

Here is another view of the painting behind Mr. Darcy.


I laughed when I saw this painting, a copy of which I have been unable to locate on any website pertaining either to the Prince of Wales (later George IV) or Sir Joshua Reynolds. The pose reminded me of a famous view of George Washington by Gilbert Stuart. A version of this painting hung in the Elgin Academy Art Gallery where I played at my piano teacher's annual recital for her students and their parents. There are other versions of the Stuart portrait, chiefly belonging to the Boston Museum of fine Arts.

Since those youthful days, the question has arisen in my mind -- why paint the rear end of the horse so prominently?  In my search of the web for a copy of the Reynolds portrait above, I found some discussions of this exact point. But no one had a definitive answer. Someone suggested that the rear o the horse was a domment by the artist on the character of the subject. One writer said Stuart was not good at painting  horses. Another said that men were so portrayed because they were prepared to jump on the horse and take off -- being in a position on the horse's left to easily reach the stirrup. Anyone have any views on this world-shattering question?





Here's another example. This is General John Manners, Marquis of Granby, who was painted by Reynolds in about 1765. He died before he succeeded to the title of Duke of Rutland. This painting hangs in the Ringling Museum of Art in Sarasota, Florida.













Above, another painting by Gilbert Stuart. The subject is Louis-Marie, the vicomte de Noailles (1756-1804), who fought with the Americans during the Revolution. He returned to Frnace but was drivien out after their revolution and moved to Philadelphia in 1793. He was a banker and a friend of Washington, neither of which explaains why he is standing next to his horse's rump.

Here is my final example, a  portrait of Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington. It hangs at the country home of the Duke, Stratfield Saye.

I welcome any comments, clues, or links to additional poses of generals (or anyone) with their horses' rumps. 


Sunday, February 21, 2010

now what shall I play around with?

So I could save some pictures and see how they come out if I do a blog on Lake Geneva. Starting with this.

This is the house at Geneva Lake, WI, known as Stone Manor. It was built by Otto Young, a German immigrant who became one of the leaders of Chicago merchandising as the head of the Fair Store on State Street.  As it stands now, the house has been considerably altered to make it into apartments. It also has housed restaurants, a night club, a school and various other enterprises. Tomu eye, it has always been the most ostentatious house on this lake lined with mansions of the 19th c. rich. This pictures is courtesy of a guy in Racine. His website is.

Another picture that I have admired since childhood is the Anders Zorn portrait of Bertha Honore Palmer, Queen of Chicago Society. Here is a partial view of the picture, which was on display at the Chicago Historical Society Museum last November in an exhibition of Mrs. Palmer's magnificent clothing and jewels.
I'll have to put that in later.'

  

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

This will be a new attempt at posting photos. One at a time.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010



okay. I tried to change the fonts, but it didn't work. I tried to add a About Me but that didn't work either. Also tried to add a link to Research England. Same result. I have missed something along the line. So here's another picture, which I think I have mastered -- uploading and changing sizes.
Patience is a virtue, or so they say.
Above, three vieews of Arthur Wellesley, first Duke of Wellington, our hero. There will be lots more on him and more pictures too. And something on his wife, Kitty Pakenham Wellesley, first Duchess of Wellington.


This is a learning experience and not intended to be shared. I want to learn to add pictures and other features. I don't want it to have any particular content at the moment.

lucinda grand? looks like tnr to me. This is a picture of me a s I looked a couple of years ago, well retouched.


And here is a picture of a Renoir portrait that I once thought looked a lot like me.